Propagent
Menu

The next generation of
proposal and response management.

Where proposals actually break

Three moments where Propagent measurably changes the proposal week.

The SME bottleneck

"Matrix has 38 rows. Three SMEs to answer them. Each one's calendar is buried with client work. We'll submit with gaps."

1
Expert bandwidth limits proposal quality
Propagent Scoped questions auto-route to the right experts, async-friendly. SMEs answer in batches, not one-offs — and the team isn't waiting on any single person to ship.
The forgotten win story

"Our strongest past-performance project for this RFP was in Maria's head. She wasn't on the response team. We submitted without it."

2
Institutional knowledge is hard to find
Propagent Past performance is queried live from project records — every relevant project surfaced, regardless of who staffed it. The right stories make it into the response, every time.
The qualification regret

"We bid anyway, even though the firm had not done a project this size in five years. Forty hours later, we lost. The warning signs were there from the start."

3
Bad-fit pursuits consume 40+ hours
Propagent Go / No-Go scores every match against firm history with confidence. Bad-fit opportunities get a clear signal before the team commits resources — and the team's effort goes to proposals they can actually win.
The workflow

From RFP published to response submitted.

Every proposal runs through these five stages. Propagent makes each one faster, sharper, and defensible.

  1. Bid Intake

    Understand intent.

    Issuer intent separated from raw requirements. What matters, what is being asked, what the submission is really trying to evaluate.

  2. Gap Analysis

    See where you're thin.

    Compare the opportunity against company expertise, available proof points, known differentiators, and missing information.

  3. Go / No-Go

    Decide what to pursue.

    Fit, competitiveness, requirements, risk, readiness. Deciding what not to pursue is almost as important as submitting a strong response.

  4. Answer Coordination

    Bring in the right expert with Confidence Routing.

    Confidence Routing flags sections that lack enough support and sends each one to the right person as a scoped question — not a full packet for midnight review.

  5. Response Maturity

    Speak in your voice.

    Final response in the firm's voice: grounded, cohesive, and specific to the issuer and the project.

Confidence Routing in practice

Get expert input only where it matters.

Propagent shows which sections are already supported and which still need judgment. Confidence Routing sends only the unanswered issue, with its context and deadline, to the right person.

Section Confidence Action Owner
Occupied-site logistics 0.92 reused Propagent
Compliance & certifications 0.88 auto-drafted Propagent
Fee & schedule stance 0.64 route Principal
Occupied-site phasing assumption 0.38 route Pre-Con SME
What the Pre-Con SME sees in their inbox scoped · bounded · ~6-minute reply
ToDavid Reyes, Sr. Estimator, Pre-Construction
ReOccupied-site phasing assumption · confidence 0.38
DeadlineTue 5pm · response submits Thu 9am
The scoped question

Issuer expects continuous operations during construction. Confirm the after-hours phasing premium for a 4-story occupied retrofit at this scale, or flag if our last similar number is stale. 1–2 sentences plus the number.

What Propagent already has (please don't repeat)
  • 2024 Hillview office: after-hours premium 11.2% (your number)
  • 2023 Madison medical: 13.8%, different trade mix
  • A current read on the right premium for this issuer's site conditions
Answer in the doc → Reuse 2024 number Send to Mark (electrical)
Estimated impact
60–80%
Time-per-response reduction
10–25%
Win-rate lift on formal procurements
+30–50%
More responses per year at the same headcount
3–5x
Faster turnaround on RFP / RFI / DDQ

Ranges drawn from AEC proposal benchmarks and peer-category outcomes. Per-customer results vary with annual proposal volume, SME availability, and prior knowledge depth.

vs response tools

Response tools stop at Submit. Propagent runs the whole proposal.

Most solutions cover one or two phases. Propagent covers the whole proposal lifecycle.

Propagent
Response tools
Bid Intake Understand intent.
Surfaces 99% of National, State, City, and County opportunities
Flags fit RFPs within an hour of publication
Parses what the buyer is actually asking for
Gap Analysis See where you're thin.
Maps RFP requirements against firm capability
Builds the compliance matrix continuously, not pre-submit
Identifies SME questions before they're asked
Go / No-Go Decide what to pursue.
Scores go/no-go with confidence on every match
Confidence-rates win probability against firm history
Surfaces competitive context for the decision
Answer Coordination Route to the right people.
Routes scoped SME questions to the right experts
Pulls past performance live by relevance
Tracks responses and dependencies across contributors
Response Maturity Speak in your voice.
Drafts in your firm's voice with evidence attached to every claim
Verifies every claim against source documents
Matures voice and themes against the firm's prior winning bids
Response memory Captured from every phase. Indexed and searchable across responses — every response makes the next one sharper.
From Bid Intake Opportunity fit evidence
From Gap Analysis Compliance interpretations
From Go / No-Go Go / No-Go decisions and outcomes
From Answer Coord. Approved SME answers
From Response Mat. Approved firm voice + win themes
What the next proposal gains By proposal 50, every prior proposal is helping with the current one — sharper qualification, better drafts from day one, fewer compliance surprises.
Sources behind every claim

Output that reviewers can audit.

The evidence stays attached to the answer. Reviewers see what the system used, where support is strong, and where a decision still needs a person.

What a reviewer sees in the draft itself hover any chip to open the source
Our team has led continuous-operations modernization on three occupied K-12 campuses [Renton SD §3.2], with phasing protocols that produced zero unplanned interruptions across 14 instructional weeks [Hillview 2024 close-out, pg 18]. After-hours phasing premiums averaged 11.2% [David Reyes · Pre-Con · 2026-05-13].

Evidence stays attached

Response content stays connected to the RFP, prior submissions, expert input, and approved firm sources. Reviewers can trace the support instead of trusting a clean paragraph on appearance alone.

Claims checked against the real record

Statements about the firm's capabilities are checked against accepted, defensible references, not pulled from boilerplate that's years out of date.

Contradictions caught before submit

When two parts of the response disagree on staffing, schedule, or fee assumptions, the contradiction is surfaced before the submission leaves the firm.

Gaps surfaced, not papered over

Where the firm is thin or missing support, the gap is shown. The team chooses how to position, route an expert question, or hold the claim.

Reviewers see what the system used

Reviewers can see what the system is doing, what sources were used, and where human judgment is still needed. They see what's there — they don't have to trust it on faith.

Knowledge that carries forward

Every response makes the next one sharper.

Propagent preserves the source-backed content, expert input, edits, and decisions your team approves. Each pursuit starts with more of your firm's best work already available.

Response 1 Useful from the first pursuit

Propagent starts with your source documents, prior work, approved content, and team decisions.

Ready for your first response
Response 10 Patterns your team can use

Your team sees which experience consistently wins, where responses fall short, and how approved firm language performs.

Prior proposal patterns become visible
Response 100+ Your firm's knowledge, ready to reuse

Qualification, evidence, expert routing, and review begin with the firm's accumulated, approved experience.

Each approved response strengthens the next
For your team

Built for every role on the response team.

Today

You're accountable for whether response cost translates into revenue.

You don't need every proposal. You need a clear read on which work is worth chasing before the team commits the hours and the SME calendar.

  • Response hours can't be tied cleanly to closed revenue
  • Win-rate moves are invisible until quarter-end
  • Opportunity cost on the deals you said no to is unmeasured
With Propagent
Active pursuits · this week
  • In flight7 responses · est. value $42M
  • Avg fit score0.71 (range 0.38–0.92)
  • Recommend no-bid2 (low fit, high effort)
  • SME hours used82 of 200 budget
  • Response hours tracked against win / loss outcomes by proposal
  • Win-rate moves surface in real time, not at quarter-end
  • Opportunity cost made explicit at every Go / No-Go
Today

You own win-rate when the team can only chase so many deals.

You need to pursue better-fit work and stop relying on instinct or rushed internal discussion. Bid-scout, qualification, and competitive context, surfaced before the deadline crunch starts.

  • RFPs surface late, after the team has already noticed
  • Go / No-Go decisions made on instinct + calendar pressure
  • Competitive field for any given RFP is mostly invisible
With Propagent
Bid Scout · this morning
  • New RFPs scanned14 across 6 portals
  • High-fit matches2 (Tacoma SD, Olympia courthouse)
  • Likely competitors3 named on Tacoma · 5 on Olympia
  • Recommend pursueTacoma: strong fit, low overlap with active work
  • Bid Scout watches portals and channels, so you see RFPs first
  • Confidence-scored qualification with competitive context
  • Likely competitors named per RFP, with how to differentiate
Today

You hold the response together with portals, spreadsheets, PDFs, email, and tribal knowledge.

You need answer coordination that doesn't turn into a midnight committee scramble. Scoped questions to the right SME in their channel, not packet review threads.

  • The same SMEs get pulled into every response, every time
  • Boilerplate is years out of date; you're rebuilding from scratch
  • Friday-afternoon "where are we on Tacoma" is your whole afternoon
With Propagent
Response coordination · today
  • In flight3 responses · Tacoma, Olympia, FMD-119
  • Sections drafted19 of 22 in the firm's approved voice
  • SMEs queried5 scoped Qs · avg 6-min reply
  • Status answer time60 seconds, not 60 minutes
  • Route only the SMEs whose expertise is genuinely missing
  • Approved past content is surfaced for each claim
  • See response status in 60 seconds, not 60 minutes
Today

You're pulled off billable work to repurpose boilerplate, again.

You'd rather get a scoped, bounded question (with what the system already has and what it needs from you) than another "please review the packet" Slack ping at 10pm.

  • Most SME requests are full-packet reviews under deadline
  • Your prior numbers are buried in old proposals nobody can find
  • Every response asks for the same after-hours phasing premium math
With Propagent
Scoped question in your inbox
  • ResponseTacoma SD #10 · phasing premium
  • Reply length1–2 sentences + the number
  • Already citedHillview 2024 (11.2%) · Madison 2023 (13.8%)
  • What's missingCurrent read for this site condition
  • Scoped questions, ~6 minutes of expert time each
  • Propagent surfaces your prior numbers, asks only what's new
  • Reusable patterns reused; responses ask only what's actually new
Pricing

One price. One system. Annual response volume, not seat counts.

Each tier covers the full proposal workflow, evidence-backed drafting, and clear reviewer controls. Tiers differ by annual proposal volume, not seat counts.

Small
$1,000/mo
For firms with up to 25 annual responses.
  • ✓ Full workflow included
  • ✓ Evidence linked to every claim
  • ✓ Contradiction & gap detection
  • ✓ Clear reviewer checkpoints
Start with Small →
Large
$5,000/mo
For firms with up to 200 annual responses.
  • ✓ Everything in Medium
  • ✓ Multi-office coordination
  • ✓ Proposal performance insights across offices
  • ✓ Priority response support
Start with Large →
Enterprise
Custom
For firms with portfolio-wide response operations.
  • ✓ Custom response volume
  • ✓ Custom integrations
  • ✓ Dedicated implementation & support
  • ✓ Procurement, security & compliance review
Talk to us →
FAQ

Straight answers to the questions proposal teams ask most.

What is Propagent?

Propagent is the next generation of proposal and response management for AEC firms. It is a system-led workflow that connects RFP requirements to firm capabilities and proof, coordinates the response, and turns that evidence into a polished case to win while people retain expertise, judgment, and final approval.

How does Propagent work?

Propagent analyzes the RFP, compares requirements with the firm's capabilities and proof, exposes gaps, coordinates focused expert input, matures the content, and checks the response through final approval. The system carries the process; people contribute expertise, apply strategic judgment, and approve the work.

How is Propagent different from RFP response tools?

Previous-generation response tools assist at isolated steps while the proposal team still searches, prompts, coordinates, reconciles, and polishes. Propagent is built around a system-led workflow that carries the response from requirements analysis through quality review, with people responsible for expertise, judgment, and approval.

What does Propagent cost?

$1,000/month for up to 25 responses a year, $2,000/month for up to 50, $5,000/month for up to 200, and custom Enterprise pricing above that. Every tier includes the full workflow; tiers are based on annual response volume, not seat counts.

What counts as a response?

A response is any RFP, RFQ, RFI, or DDQ you run through Propagent — including opportunities you no-bid after Go / No-Go. We track usage on a three-month rolling average: if you're on pace to pass your tier's ceiling, we tell you early — and when you reach it, upgrading is your call. Billing never increases automatically.

Who is Propagent for?

Architecture, engineering, and construction firms — and every role on the response team: principals, BD and capture leads, marketing and proposal managers, and pre-con SMEs.

Can reviewers trust the output?

Propagent checks response content against the available RFP and firm sources, keeps the supporting evidence visible, flags unsupported claims and gaps, and surfaces contradictions for review. A person remains responsible for strategic judgment and final approval.

Can I try Propagent without a call?

Yes. Upload an RFP or a past response at the free RFP Grader for a graded report by email. Or book a 60-minute Propagent demo and bring a live opportunity for a pursuit-specific walkthrough.

Talk to Propagent

Book a Propagent demo.

60 minutes. Bring a real opportunity. We'll work through intake, gap analysis, Go / No-Go, answer coordination, and response maturity so you can see where the response gets sharper, faster, and more specific.

  • 60 minutes, real RFP
  • See every claim connected to its source
  • See focused questions routed to the right expert with Confidence Routing
  • Leave with a prioritized pursuit assessment

Direct link: propagent.ai/60min-meeting · Prefer email? daniel@propagent.ai